Ahh I do that every day in engineering :--) Hey if you collide take a look at router renumbering spec for IPv6 :--)
We have way to many specs to read I have no clue how the IESG keeps up with it all. That is why it's a full time job right there. Let alone all the other stuff they have to do. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick 'Sharkey' Moore [mailto:sharkey@;zoic.org] > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:37 PM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: James Kempf; Alper E. YEGIN; Pekka Savola; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Optimistic DAD draft ... > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:24:24PM -0400, Bound, Jim wrote: > > Nick per hmip I rest my case :---) below. I don't have and opinion > > not my discipline but I would like to see James, Hesham, you, et al > > agree > > :----) How about for the greater good :--) > > Should our opinions collide, we'll reconfigure :-) > > I guess I'm working from a different angle to most, too: > "What is the minimum required for a useful fast, smooth > MIPv6" vs. "What is the most perfect system which is still > implementable". > > -----Nick > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
