On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:24:24PM -0400, Bound, Jim wrote: > Nick per hmip I rest my case :---) below. I don't have and opinion not > my discipline but I would like to see James, Hesham, you, et al agree > :----) How about for the greater good :--)
Should our opinions collide, we'll reconfigure :-) I guess I'm working from a different angle to most, too: "What is the minimum required for a useful fast, smooth MIPv6" vs. "What is the most perfect system which is still implementable". -----Nick -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
