>
> Hi Mark,
>
> > I've already said how to put them in the DNS. It requires a new
> > record but it will work and it will remove the need for two faced
> > DNS unless the sites *wants* to use two faced DNS to hide the
> > records.
>
> I don't have enough DNS expertise to fully evaluate your idea, but it
> looks like an interesting possibility to resolve several problems with
> putting IPv6 site-local addresses in the DNS.
>
> Have you made this suggestion on any DNS-related groups, like dnsext,
> perhaps? It would be interesting to see if other DNS folks think that
> this makes sense.
>
> Margaret
I've bounced the idea of other DNS folks in the past and
they have been happy enough with it. It was more a problem
of getting it heard here.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
