--On mandag, november 11, 2002 15:48:17 -0800 Michel Py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: metro addressing?You can have a quick look at this, WIP. http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/geov6.txt
hey - if Bergen gets a /32, Trondheim should get one too :-) but this really belongs on multi6, I think.
Apart from not having any administratively fixed boundaries, I haven't seen any need for a difference until someone comes along with a genuinely better idea.btw, my current naive prediction of the way the Internet will evolve is that unless new invention occurs, the default-free zone will eventually be flat-routing on the number of ISPs in the world, and that this number will have 5 digits.What would be the difference between this and the good old "8K DFZ", except one more digit and that ISPs could get a block matching their size instead of what used to be called a TLA?
but as I said, I am naive in those matters.
Harald
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
