> Okay. > > But, why make them inherently private, non-routable addresses? > If we come up with a reasonable way to allocate globally-unique, > provider-independent addresses, is there a reason to require > that they be non-globally-routable?
those would be okay for my purposes. because I see global routing in the public network as a special case of routing between networks, I don't see that having a "non globally routable" attribute embedded in the address is that useful - any more than having a "site local" attribute. if you don't trust your border filters I don't know why you'd trust the rest of the network to do your filtering for you. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
