> But, what I don't understand is how the use of overlapping > site-local addresses on globally-attached networks is any > better than NAT.
It is not. Same problems that NAT has. And loss of e2e: apps, security, and mobility for those who only have those SLs. Not good. As a note industry will have a lot to say if this is deployed too. The education of NAT vs NO NAT is happening as we speak. Regards, /jim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
