Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Unfortunately it's too late to catch the addressing architecture document unless we recall it from the RFC Editor and cycle it through the IESG again. But I propose that we do exactly that, in order to change the following paragraph in section 2.5.6:
[...]
Alternatively, we could spend the next 5 years discussing the unnecessary complexities of using site-locals on connected sites. Brian
As I would like to see IPv6 deployed in my lifetime, I support proposal like this one that makes life simpler. It's time to move on, unless the volume of discussion/rat holing on this topic will really become a DOS attack on the mailling list, or worse, on IPv6 itself. - Alain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
