> Keith; > > At 09:27 PM 11/12/02 -0500, Keith Moore wrote: > >[snip snip snip] > >No. Scopes reduce the ablity of the network to support apps. > >They make it harder to produce an app that works independently > >of network location, and they don't add a single extra capability > >that wasn't present already. > > You keep saying that some apps will fail with scoped > addresses. My poor > brain can't grasp why this is so. Can you give me a > detailed example of > how an app will fail if it has multiple scoped addresses to > choice from?
=> I think he did to some extent, but the point is Brian Z. and Rich already showed how this can be done. Sure there is additional complexity, but didn't we know this 3 years ago ? I think we did. Harald's email is a good example of the complexities introduced in the DNS, but it is solveable, that's why I think a BCP will be much more convincing than changing a couple of lines in the existing RFC. Hesham -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
