James Kempf worte: > The problem with this proposal is that the AP doesn't exist as far as IETF is > concerned. An AP is not an IP device, and it is not on the map as far as the > Internet architecture is concerned.. Routers do exist and therefore the fast RA > could be standardized in the IETF. > > That said, I think the proposal is a good one and it should be taken to IEEE > 802.11. Somehow, we need to figure out a way to get 802.11 to pay more attention > to MIP. > > jak
as i know, there are two 802.11 deployments : with relays APs and with integrated AP/AR. thus, i think this proposal(APs cache RAs) can be considered in IETF if 802.11 deployments with "integrated AP/AR" is considered. what do you think? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
