I agree with Hesham.  I think there is a lot of difference between RA interval 
changes that have been in the MIPv6 draft a long time and Fast RAs that has 
known failure modes that need to be experimented with to determine their 
significance.

I'd add the minor points that section 11.5.2 contains a basic version of optimistic 
DAD (its been there since draft 12) and that there AP cached RAs are an 
alternative to fast RAs in yet another separate draft.

Richard.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hesham Soliman (EAB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:52 am
Subject: RE: MIPv6 and ND value changes

> I'm getting very confused when reading this 
> discussion. Some people are focusing on the 
> RA intervals, others about DAD (2462) and 
> others talk generally about ND. 
> 
> Please divide the issues...
> AFAIK we have the following (independent) issues:
> 
> - RA intervals were reduced by MIPv6 (changing 2461)
> - When DAD fails we configure a new address and try again (2462)
> - Elimination of DAD delays (optimistic DAD)
> - Eliminsation of the random delay before sending an RA (fast RA)
> 
> The last two bullets are addressed in separate drafts. 
> The first 2 bullets are in the MIPv6 spec, and the 
> second bullet has nothing to do with 2461.
> 
> There are different value for each point, they're all
> important, but let's not lump them all in one discussion.
> 
> Hesham
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to