> > - RA intervals were reduced by MIPv6 (changing 2461) > > > - When DAD fails we configure a new address and try again (2462) > > > - Elimination of DAD delays (optimistic DAD) > > > - Eliminsation of the random delay before sending an RA > (fast RA) > > > > > > The last two bullets are addressed in separate drafts. > > > The first 2 bullets are in the MIPv6 spec, and the > > > second bullet has nothing to do with 2461. > > > > I agree with Hesham. we should treat them as separate issues > > instead of lumping them all as ND changes. atleast bullets > > 1 and 2 should definitely be in the MIPv6 spec. > > Disagree on 1. and _definitely on 2.
=> Why do you disagree with 2? Do you think a MN should disable an interface when DAD fails the first time? Sounds disastrous Hesham > > -- > Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, > Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" > Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
