On torsdag, nov 21, 2002, at 04:01 Europe/Stockholm, Erik Nordmark wrote:

This assumes that ISPs will use site-locals. So far I haven't seen any
claims of benefits for ISPs to configure site boundaries and use site-local
addresses in their network.
If the ISPs don't use it the only boundaries would be at the attacker (which
might be able to control its site boundary) and at the attacked site, thus
no additional depth.

Any ISPs care to comment on this?
As ex-ISP I agree. Just as basically noone is installing RFC1918 space today. Border will be at the ISP aggregation router or ISP controlled CPE.

- kurtis -

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to