> I guess we are stuck with site local for now. As long as we don't have a willingness to either solve the problems with site-locals (by imposing limits on their use ) or to solve those problems in other ways (e.g. by providing provider-independent addresses) I think we are stuck in general. But I don't find the argument that we must have site-locals (even though we know they are broken) because we aren't willing to solve the problems in a better way, very persuasive. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Tim Chown
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Keith Moore
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Erik Nordmark
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Brian Zill
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Erik Nordmark
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Keith Moore
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Bound, Jim
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Christian Huitema
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Keith Moore
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Richard Draves
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Richard Draves
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Michael Thomas
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Keith Moore
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Keith Moore
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Richard Draves
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Keith Moore
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Erik Nordmark
- RE: Proposal for site-local clean-up Pekka Savola
- Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up Kurt Erik Lindqvist
