> I find this kind of thinking rather suspect. The > question in my mind shouldn't be "why global", but > "why not global". There seems to an underlying > assumption that site locals would give better > security properties due to their global > inaccessibility. I find that rather uncompelling > and misguided as this is just carrying forth the > broken assumption that barriers (firewalls, etc) > can do an adequate job of protecting > things. Anything which propogates that sort of > thinking is, IMO (and almost certainly not in my > employer's) bogus and needs to checked. We need > keep beating the strong auth/authz drum here.
I'm very much in agreement with this sentiment. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
