Steven, >> Michel Py wrote: >> Ambiguity is a fail-safe for routes that leak into >> the DFZ, even though they were not supposed to, and >> for ISPs that don't filter traffic, even though they >> were supposed to. In order to remove ambiguity, we >> must replace the fail-safe it provides by something >> else, and that something else is IMHO a requirement >> that router vendors implement the necessary filters >> as being default configuration.
> Steven Blake wrote: > What technical problem are you trying to solve? Are > you trying to prevent inadvertent leakage of prefixes? Inadvertent, sabotage, hackers, stupidity, ignorance.... > Or are you trying to impose aggregatible prefixes on > institutions that may be able to afford other > arrangements? I don't see the relation? Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
