Mark, > Mark Smith wrote: > Michel, maybe my mind isn't lateral enough, but I > can't think of an example of anybody who would want > to pay for guaranteed globally unique site local > addresses. Usually people seem to be happy with > "good enough and free" verses "perfect and not-free". > Are there any examples you might be able to give ?
Any organization that is serious about using site-locals. Two examples comes to mind: - Corporate mergers (avoids the renumbering pain found today when the two corporations were using 10.0.0.0) - VPN connections. As Brian Carpenter mentioned earlier, globally unique site locals are not good for IPv6 NAT, so let's figure them out. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
