> Mark Smith wrote: > Lack of absolute guarantees of globally unique site local > addressing is a bit of a "stick" that will prevent people > from trying to use their globally unique site locals for > global communications, as per Brian Zill's concerns.
I have voiced these concerns myself earlier, and they are valid. However, this stick is really not big and would not prevent these addresses to leak in the defauless route if there is no other enforcement mechanism. > I also like the fact that his model doesn't require any > interaction with a registry of some sort, and any > associated costs ie. his model is "good enough and free", > rather than "perfect and not-free". There is room for both models at the same, and "good enough" is not going to be good enough for everybody. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
