>We should get the IPv6 case right. However if we believe that
>dual stack is the likely IPv6 deployment scenario we are only
>addressing well less than half the immediate problem.
if we can declare that there should be no site-local/link-local unicast
address available on the DNS reverse mapping, we could deploy host
implmentation that never perform reverse lookup for those addresses.
it will screw up people who plans to use site-locals in two-faced DNS,
though...
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
