Which is the moment when you would discover that your prefix wasn't
unique enough, so you'd go and get a new one. Not a big problem, since
it would be very rare.
Brian
Keith Moore wrote:
>
> > "nearly unique" is not good enough. You want to be able to
> > register these addresses in the ip6.arpa tree.
>
> yeech. it's a good point.
>
> Keith
>
> p.s. though I can't help but think that something is terribly broken
> about our way of doing address lookups if it imposes this kind of
> constraint on how we assign addresses.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
