Re Steve Bellovin's proposal - > I'd like to hear opinions from pro-site-local people on how > it looks like.
It looks a lot like the site prefix table described in draft-ietf-ipngwg-site-prefixes-05. If you don't have site locals then it's OK - better than nothing. But I think it's not as good as site locals, because the "security" of site's global prefix will rest on filtering being done at one point, whereas site locals will be filtered throughout the internet backbone. If GUPIs are filtered in the backbone then they would be better for the same reason. Rich -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
