> The <insert letter>GUPI model will drive the development of NATs.
that's just nuts. GUPIs don't encourage NATs any more than any other aspect of IPv6. I'm beginning to think that citing NATs as a reason for not doing something in IPv6 is like comparing someone to Hitler in a political discussion - it's such an extreme statement that it can't be evaluated. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
