On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:50:04 -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> - We need to provide PI addressing in IPv6, or we will
> see wide deployment of IPv6 NAT in enterprises
> and homes. No one seems to be disagreeing with
> this.
I don't know yet if I agree or not :-) I agree that it is a good
idea to explore the topic of PI addressing. But if you look at the
requirements, it might be better to take a more fundamental approach
and look into the separatiion of locator and identifier.
I _do_ agree that we must avoid IPv6 NAT!
rvdp
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
