> > 1. Local, private addresses that do not communicate outside of their site.
> > Site-locals are perfect for this, if they are not limited to disconnected
> > sites.
> >
> > 2. Unique addresses that do not need public Internet access but do need to
> > communicate with selected external sites (example customer/supplier VPN). T
> his
> > is GUPI.
> >
> > 3. Global network layer PI identifiers. Although this is not directly linke
> d
> > to the multihoming issue, it is likely that a scalable multihoming solution
> > would provide it.
> >
> > I do not envision a large-scale deployment of IPv6 without providing all
> > three. Also, it would be a hell of a good idea if 2. could migrate to 3.
>
> why doesn't #1 suffice for #2?
Keith are you sure you ment this?
#2 works for #1 not the other way around.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
