> 2) There seems to be a need for a globally unique version of Site Local > addresses (GUSL), so we should just define a new block for them. > These would require registration, and perhaps a fee, just like when > you get a domain name.
I think it's still up in the air as to whether these are really local to a site in the sense that site-locals were assumed to be. In other words, can they be routed between sites by private agreement? > 4) The people who really want GRUPI addresses should work on the scaling > issues with routing, and if that is ever solved then a new block of > addresses can be allocated for GRUPI. or they can just start routing GUPIs. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
