>> Michel Py wrote: >> The lack of global routability of site-local addresses >> is a feature, not a bug.
> Keith Moore wrote: > I don't think we have concensus on that. There is a DS in the queue, because it has reached consensus. This is part of the IPv6 architecture. What lacks consensus is to change this. > there seem to be at least a few people who want PI > a ddresses that *are* routable, or at least, for which > such restrictions are not imposed. Including me. This is not incompatible with globally unique, not globally routable site-locals, but not the same thing either. > I'm sympathetic to the concerns about routing table size > and routing computation overhead, but I'm not sure that > mandatory or even default filtering of GUPIs is the right > thing in the long term. There is no relation. What we are trying to do here is to remove the ambiguity of site-local addresses, not to create globally routable PI. These are different topics. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
