Keith Moore wrote: > > > I'm still unsure about this insistence on /48 as a critical point of > > allocation. > > renumbering is a lot more painful if you're trying to renumber > between prefixes of different lengths.
Exactly. And we agreed a long time ago on /48 as the normal (but not architecturally required) prefix length for every site, except for degenerate /64 sites with no subnetting. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
