> Ignoring the area field (that I am starting to think was a mistake) for a > minute, the idea in the draft is that one could have site-local prefixes > that are independent from the global prefixes and would not have to be > renumbered.
operationally I think it would be a mess to have site-locals routed differently within a site than globals. it's not that you can't do it, it's that it makes life more difficult, and GUPIs seem to be a better way to solve the same problem. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
