Hi Brian, > I agree, after re-reading the formal definitions in RFC 2119. And I > don't think we need any discussion text; the implications are already > covered in 3041. > > The default can be left to the vendor IMHO.
I agree. I have added the text: Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration [RFC-3041] SHOULD be supported. It is recommended that node behavior be configurable when they are available. br, John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
