> Using RFC3041-type addresses is IMHO not a property of node, > not a property of user context, and not even a property of applications. > This is a property of the specific connections within each application.
I agree, privacy is the claim of user to determine for him or herself when and how and what extent certain information is communicated to others (Westin dixit). I will be very happy to see RFC3041-capability "always" built-in and an application driven/user driven socket option to enable the use that kind of addresses. /aep > I think some of this discussion should be capture in the node > requirement document. > > - Alain. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- "To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk" -- Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931) -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
