Hi Samita, > In the last sentence, did you mean to say that the node should have a > configuration knob whether to turn on privacy extension behavior ? > > If so, would it be clearer to say something like the following ? > > 'It is recommended that the node be configurable to turn on/off > the privacy extension for stateless address autoconfiguration, when > it is implemented.'
It should be something like that, but I think Alain was suggesting that a node-based policy would not be sufficient. It should be at least application based policy, since different applications will not work with 3041 addresses. br, John > Otherwise, as Alain mentioned, it's up to the application and > system-default > configuration to use temporary or public address for a connection. > We have discussed about possible socket API solution for > source address > selection on per-socket basis. A draft is in plan for that. > > -Samita > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
