John, > Jim, > > > Hosts MAY support mobile node functionality. > > > > This should be SHOULD. The changing specs are not or can > be an issue > > but this document is riddled with changing specs. > > I don't believe that servers, for example, need to implement > mobile node functionality. If a node is fixed and will not > move, what use is mobile node functionality?
A server in a helicopter or plane is mobile for a few applications. I understand I am trying to make a point that this exercise needs to be focused on more than the term "node". > > > > Hosts SHOULD support route optimization requirements for > > > correspondent nodes. Routers do not need to support route > > > optimization. > > > > > > Routers MAY support home agent functionality. > > > > Routers SHOULD support the HA is correct effort. Otherwise > > MIPv6 don't work. > > Not all routers need to be Home Agents I don't believe that > plain, vanilla routers will be affected by home agent functionality. Routers that implement MIPv6 SHOULD support HAs. Again context is everything. Thanks /jim > > John > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
