On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Bound, Jim wrote: > > > A server in a helicopter or plane is mobile for a few > > applications. I > > > understand I am trying to make a point that this exercise > > needs to be > > > focused on more than the term "node". > > > > Such is hardly a minimal or even typical case of IPv6. > > So you only want to work on the typical case in the IETF? > > It appears you do not care about the non typical?
No, but we certainly *must* consider what's typical when setting *requirements* for *all* nodes. Non-typical cases are fine -- and will be used, that's great, the more IPv6 the better -- but I don't see why such should set what the mainline does. I can easily envision server on a helicopter. That's a case, of course. But something that must be taken into consideration when implementing the helicopter and the server. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
