(oops, sorry, the message was incomplete)
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 03:31:22 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> As for other configuration (e.g. DHCPv6) by DHCPv6:
> I would vote for SHOULD, with one condition that
... that the other configuration specification is clearly separated
from full support of DHCPv6 (to mitigate the load of implementing the
full spec). draft-droms-dhcpv6-stateless-guide may help to explore
this separation.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
