EricLKlein wrote: <SNIP> > I agree, under the autoconfigure feature you should be able to do this > easily.
Should. > Say that both networks were using the FE8::xxxx:xxxx network, > then one of them could change this to FE9::xxxx:xxxx prior to the merge, > and then just link them. > > Should be a piece of cake. An alternative would be simply to > go from both being FE8::xxxx:xxxx to one being FE8:1::xxxx:xxxx and > the other being FE8:2::xxxx:xxxx This way there would be the ability of > splitting sites and such by the thousands, and only using NAT for the > public Internet connections. And another Should. I suggest you use a lab setup with at least 50k hosts on both sides and then try and merge those networks. And please take into account that both netadmin groups don't like each others job to be taken over by the other folks, because 'the network was first ours and now we have to share' and that the external parties which administer the out-of-organization facilities aren't cooperating very well. Oh wait you will pay them a load of money ofcourse ;) Greets, Jeroen -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
