> Mike Saywell wrote: > >>I can't really see the motivations to do NAT under v6 when it's so easy >>to have multiple addresses on an interface anyway. Joining 2 networks >>which use the same address site-local addresses would be nowhere near >>as painfull as before since it's that much easier to re-number one of >>them under v6. >> > Multiple addresses means the application has to choose which to use. This is > a non-starter.
IPv6 has multiple addresses anyway. or do you propose to remove link-locals too? /ot -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
