On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:39:33AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote: > There is some appeal to 6to4 and 1918... it keeps > the problem within the cesspool of current usage > and doesn't try to rationalize it any further. > A maze of twisty addresses, all alike...
But as Pekka says, won't 6to4 interfaces fail to deliver to 2002:<RFC1918> if the network is IPv6 only, or doesn't use IPv4 private IPs? Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
