On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:15:36PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I think you're missing Alain's point. If a host happens to have 2 addresses > at a given moment, one left over from the disconnected state and one with > the recently available connected prefix, either address will work fine for > internal usage, and of course only the second one will work for external usage. > > This does lead to DDNS and 2 face DNS, but that's where we are heading > in any case.
So is it actually having a recommended prefix for disconnected networks that's the issue, or having special scope prrocessing for a specific prefix, or both? :) I think this is what Alain is indirectly asking/suggesting. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
