On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:46:51AM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Tim Chown wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > > > > When IPv6 began, it was certainly the disconnected sites argument that > > > made me happy with site locals; but we hadn't thought through the scope > > > issues or the issues of intermittently connected sites, and both of those > > > are messy enough that I am now against site locals. > > > > So, as Michel asked, what's the solution for intermittently connected sites > > in the absence of site locals? > > Well, I'd hoped to avoid that question until we had mailing list consensus > on deprecating SLs.
I think (even) more people would back the deprecation of the specific "problem" cases can be addressed first. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
