On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Tim Chown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > > When IPv6 began, it was certainly the disconnected sites argument that > > made me happy with site locals; but we hadn't thought through the scope > > issues or the issues of intermittently connected sites, and both of those > > are messy enough that I am now against site locals. > > So, as Michel asked, what's the solution for intermittently connected sites > in the absence of site locals?
Route advertisements with long-enough lifetimes and fast-enough _deprecation_ (when reconnecting) seems one approach to look at more closely, IMO. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
