On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:43:23PM -0800, Tony Hain wrote: > I agree that much of the group doesn't understand the requirements of > the network managers, so I have started a draft on that subject. Granted > this is an early pass, with content based primarily on previous email, > but it does provide a basis for discussion. Comments requested: > http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/site-local.txt
It's good that this subject is attracting an I-D. Perhaps we should first focus on "IPv6 address requirements for networks" from which we could judge the relative merits and failings of solutions that meet those requirements - address stability, surviving network disconnection, renumbering on (re-)connection, etc... for different classes of networks. Of course, a "Site Locals Considered Harmful" would also be useful (Keith, you know it makes sense, and less effort than 100 emails to the list :) If such opinion can be documented we may save a few hundred emails when Margaret puts out the call for list consensus (or maybe we won't...) Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
