> Markku Savela wrote: > - The addresses are unreachable outside of their > original context. > Some may think the above is actually a benefit: > all those organizations using the IPv4 private > address spaces will want equivalent IPv6 space.
Agree with Markku's post 100%. I have said I would support deprecation but certainly not before solutions to replaced what deprecation takes away are developed. There certainly are some issues with the scoped architecture and there also is the issue of private addresses with an architectural limitation to make them unroutable, please see one of my posts on the IETF list recently. "Just hijack a prefix that nobody else uses" is not an option and deprecation, should it happen, needs to provide a replacement for what it takes away _before_ it eventually happens. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
