> Before responding to the consensus call on site-local addresses, I'd
> like to ask one question for clarification.  (As required, I changed
> the subject line).
> 
> What was the consensus, if any, on alternatives to site-locals when SL
> is deprecated?  In particular, which prefixes will we use for
> disconnected or intermittently connected "site"s?  I've checked the
> chair's presentation slides and the draft minutes, and (roughly)
> followed the very recent discussion in the ML, but I cannot be sure
> about it.

        The concensus call was predicated on "we will find another way
        to deal with disconnected / intermittently connected site."

        The was no concensus on how this would be achieved but there wa
        a commitment to find a solution if site-locals were deprecated.

        There are plenty of potential ways to achieve this some of
        which include:
        * get a prefix for disconnected access from a ISP.
        * set up registries.

        Mark

> According to the draft minutes, someone mentioned we can use arbitrary
> prefixes for those purposes.  That's true, but we cannot assure the
> uniqueness of the arbitrary-chosen prefixes, so I don't see any
> essential advantage over the existing fec0::/10 (with eliminating the
> "full" usage).
>
> I can live without site-locals, and, furthermore, I personally want
> the wg to stop the endless discussion and to concentrate on more
> important -from my personal perspective- issues.  So, even if the
> idea of "arbitrary-chosen prefixes" is just a compromise (without any
> real benefit) to convince ourselves, it's okay for me.  Then I'll vote
> for deprecating site-local.
> 
> Could someone clarify this point, please?
> 
>                                       JINMEI, Tatuya
>                                       Communication Platform Lab.
>                                       Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
>                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to