[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hiroki Ishibashi wrote:
<SNIP> > > > There are plenty of potential ways to achieve this some of > > > which include: > > > * get a prefix for disconnected access from a ISP. > > > * set up registries. > > > > These will definitely increase the cost of owning even disconnected > > IPv6 networks. > > > > Hiroki Ishibashi > > TNSTAAFL > > RFC 1918 addresses cost real money to support. There are > sacrificial machines that just serve reverse lookups for > these addresses. They actually receive more traffic than > the root servers. Fortunatly AS112 now catches these at some IX'es thus lowering *transit* traffic. > Put the costs of supporting disconnected / intermittently > connected sites back on the sites that need this fuctionality. > Having to lease a prefix will help cover the costs of > supporting the reverse lookups on leaked lookups. If someone doesn't want/like this they can pick a random number and use that, they still have to renumber when they interconnect to another site or the internet. Greets, Jeroen -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
