> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Hiroki Ishibashi wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > > > There are plenty of potential ways to achieve this some of
> > > > which include:
> > > > * get a prefix for disconnected access from a ISP.
> > > > * set up registries.
> > >
> > > These will definitely increase the cost of owning even disconnected
> > > IPv6 networks.
> > >
> > > Hiroki Ishibashi
> >
> > TNSTAAFL
> >
> > RFC 1918 addresses cost real money to support. There are
> > sacrificial machines that just serve reverse lookups for
> > these addresses. They actually receive more traffic than
> > the root servers.
>
> Fortunatly AS112 now catches these at some IX'es thus
> lowering *transit* traffic.
They still have to be caught and machines have to return
NXDOMAIN. These machines are NOT being paid for by the
people who are leaking the traffic.
> > Put the costs of supporting disconnected / intermittently
> > connected sites back on the sites that need this fuctionality.
> > Having to lease a prefix will help cover the costs of
> > supporting the reverse lookups on leaked lookups.
>
> If someone doesn't want/like this they can pick a random number
> and use that, they still have to renumber when they interconnect
> to another site or the internet.
Well if they are not connected at all there is no costs to
be bourn by eveyone else.
> Greets,
> Jeroen
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
