On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 05:06:08PM +0100, Mike Saywell wrote: > Not if the ad-hoc routing protocol assigns/negotiates one...
Note also in Mike's scenario he needs /48's to networks attached to the community mesh, so the /10 property of a site-local is required, and solutions which may allocate "random", non-aggregating /48's or even /64's are not so desirable. Also, some nodes on the network have access to uplinks, some do not, yet all should be able to communicate internally. Enquiries to get a global prefix under the current schemes have not been successful; the community network would need to find the $$$ for LIR fees. A site local /10 is free. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
