> Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Exactly. It was the present incarnation, not some > possible future incarnation, that I raised my hand > against.
Really? By trying to sneak a major architectural change into a last 24 hour "editorial" change? I am going to file an appeal about how this entire situation was handled on the first place. What kind of work is that? Gathering consensus on a text that nobody has seen because it does not exist yet? This consensus has no value and I will now push this issue all the way to the top. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
