Hi Michel,
No one is planning to change anything in the last 24 hours...
The current addressing architecture has been approved for publication at PS, and it will be published at PS (barring unforseen circumstances).
We are currently discussing what the IPv6 working group wants to do in future versions of the addressing architecture and scoped addressing architecture. If we decide to deprecate site-local addresses, then a new version of the addressing architecture will be produced that deprecates site-locals. It will be reviewed by the WG, sent to WG last call, sent to the IESG for approval, etc... All using the usual IETF processes.
Margaret
At 08:05 AM 4/2/2003 -0800, Michel Py wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Exactly. It was the present incarnation, not some > possible future incarnation, that I raised my hand > against.
Really? By trying to sneak a major architectural change into a last 24 hour "editorial" change? I am going to file an appeal about how this entire situation was handled on the first place.
What kind of work is that? Gathering consensus on a text that nobody has seen because it does not exist yet? This consensus has no value and I will now push this issue all the way to the top.
Michel.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
