Leif Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Dan Lanciani wrote:
|
|>[This response was apparently lost, so I'm resending it.]
|>
|>
|>
|>We know how to achieve it. You may not like the way we achieve it because
|>it doesn't meet your standards for architectural purity, but until you have
|>a better approach, how about letting use keep our impure solutions?
|>
|>
|>
|I continue to be surprised by the number of people who continue to argue
|for a
|solution which apps people say *will not work*.
I am an apps person. I am also a stack person. I am also a network person.
What makes you think that the apps people who say it *will not work* are
correct? Especially when they are talking about models that are already in
use?
Dan Lanciani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
