Leif Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Dan Lanciani wrote:
|
|>the causes--of a restrictive address allocation policy. Would you deprive
|>people of the address space they need to run the applications they need to
|>run just to make it easier to write some other super-apps that those users
|>
|>
|
|No I want people to have global addresses!
That may be what you want, but that is not what you have been saying. You
are advocating taking away private address space. Contrary to recent popular
(yet incomprehensible) thought these actions are not equivalent. How about
you FIRST give people global addresses and THEN AFTER those people see that
those addresses have the properties that they need in order to use their
networks you can take away their private addresses? I'm sure that most people
will willingly give up their private address space AFTER they have globals
with the same (or better) level of stability.
Dan Lanciani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
