I was not aware that there was a problem getting global v6 addresses! Please explain.
That may be what you want, but that is not what you have been saying. You
are advocating taking away private address space. Contrary to recent popular
(yet incomprehensible) thought these actions are not equivalent. How about
you FIRST give people global addresses and THEN AFTER those people see that
those addresses have the properties that they need in order to use their
networks you can take away their private addresses? I'm sure that most people
will willingly give up their private address space AFTER they have globals
with the same (or better) level of stability.
Or perhaps you are thinking about global addresses with certain properties (provider
independence perhaps)? Please make the distinction for the sake of clarity.
BTW There is a flaw in your reasoning; people never give up any type of addresses,
private or global. Once products are shipping with support for v6 private addresses
thats it. Private addresses won't go away if we let the cat out of the bag now.
MVH leifj
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
